Michael Spooneybarger/Reuters
An inspection found a crack in a turbine blade in the engine of one of the planes.
By CHRISTOPHER DREW
Published: February 22, 2013
The Pentagon said on Friday that it had grounded all of its stealthy new F-35 fighter jets after an inspection found a crack in a turbine blade in the engine of one of the planes.
The suspension of flights comes at an awkward time for the military,
which is facing automatic budget cuts that could slow its purchases of
the planes. The Pentagon grounded all three versions of the jets — for
the Air Force, the Navy and the Marines — on Thursday while it
investigated the problem.
Lockheed Martin, which makes the high-tech plane, said 64 of the jets
would be affected. The Pentagon estimates that it could spend as much as
$396 billion to buy 2,456 of the jets by the late 2030s. But the
program, the most expensive in military history, has been plagued by
cost overruns and delays, and it could easily become a target for budget
cutters.
The Pentagon office that runs the program said the crack in the turbine
blade was discovered on Tuesday in a routine inspection. The crack
occurred on a test plane at Edwards Air Force Base in California. The
blade is being shipped to a plant in Connecticut, where the engine
manufacturer, Pratt & Whitney, will inspect it and look for the
problem’s cause.
Matthew C. Bates, a spokesman for Pratt & Whitney, said none of the
other F-35s had suffered any cracks. The F-35 program office in the
Pentagon said in a statement that it had suspended the flights as a
precaution until the investigation was completed and the cause of the
cracking was fully understood.
The turbine problem, first reported by Politico Pro,
arose as the Pentagon has sought to persuade Congress to cancel the
automatic cuts, which could force the military to reduce its budgets by
about $500 billion over the next 10 years. The first installment of the
cuts is scheduled to start on Friday, and it may force the Pentagon to
delay buying three of the approximately 30 F-35 planes it had planned to
order this year.
“We don’t know the severity of the problem with the turbine blade,” said
Richard L. Aboulafia, an aviation analyst at the Teal Group in Fairfax,
Va. “It could be a one-off or it could be something that needs more
attention. But either way, given the political scrutiny and the concerns
about the plane’s cost and performance, this is a very bad time to have
a problem.”
The F-35 was conceived as the Pentagon’s silver bullet in the sky — a
state-of-the art aircraft with advances that would easily overcome the
defenses of most foes. The radar-evading jets would dodge sophisticated
antiaircraft missiles and give pilots a better picture of enemy threats
while enabling allies, who want the planes, too, to fight more closely
with American forces.
But the ambitious aircraft instead illustrates how the Pentagon can let
huge and complex programs veer out of control. The program has run into
other technical problems and nearly doubled in cost as Lockheed and the
military’s own bureaucracy failed to deliver on the most basic promise
of a three-in-one jet that would save taxpayers money and be delivered
speedily.
Behind the scenes, the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin had also engaged in a
conflict of their own over the costs, though both sides now say that
the relationship has improved and that the program is making progress.
The number of test flights had picked up, and the Marines said before
the grounding this week that they were about to shift from simply
testing the planes to starting to fly them operationally.
The Pentagon had also reached new contracts recently with Lockheed and
Pratt & Whitney that lowered the cost of each aircraft body and
engine.
Mr. Bates, the Pratt & Whitney spokesman, said a similar turbine
blade in an engine built for testing purposes also cracked in 2007. But
he said the blade was redesigned after that, and this week’s failure did
not appear to be related.
With all the delays — full production is not expected until 2019 — the
military has spent billions to extend the lives of older fighters and
buy more of them to fill the gap. At the same time, the cost to build
each F-35 has risen to an average of $137 million from $69 million in
2001.
Winslow T. Wheeler, a former Senate staff member who is one of the
plane’s biggest critics, said Friday that the program was still only
about 30 percent through its testing. While the crack in the turbine
blade may just be a minor flaw, he said, it is unlikely to pose a
significant problem to continuing the program. “The Pentagon’s current
management is hooked on the airplane and refuses to admit it is a
failure,” he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment